In the defense of “greeting card verse” and normal folks who like art

By luckypennies

I’ve finally written a new poem that I actually like.  It’s been a while since I posted one.  Poems have been few and far between for me lately.  Writing poetry has become sort of painful.  When I was younger, I would write a poem about every other thing that happened in my life.  They flowed easily and unselfconsciously, and though most of them weren’t anything a literary journal would be jumping to publish, at least they made me happy. 

Now so little of the poetry I write pleases me.  And I don’t particularly enjoy writing it, either.

What’s the difference? 

For one thing, I’ve had a little bit of training.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not blaming my professors or any of the other people who’ve taught me in the past.  My poetry professor was the best professor I had last year, and the people I had class with were great.  But that little bit of training was enough to push me into no man’s land, that desolate place between so-called pedestrian verse and the stuffy kind of poetry that only MFAs enjoy.  I don’t write the kind of stuff that your average high-school-educated Joe would necessarily like, but I don’t write to appease the highfalutin folk either.  Really, I don’t know who I’m writing for anymore.  And that is a grave problem.  Ted Kooser, in The Poetry Home Repair Manual, says that you need what he calls an “Imaginary Reader,” someone who represents your audience.  Similiarly, Steven King calls that person the “Ideal Reader” in On Writing.   

Sadly, I don’t have either. 

And I can’t be one of those people who pretends that they only write to please themselves, because that’s not true.  I really can’t stand those kind of people.  There’s no joy in making something beautiful if you’re only going to keep it under wraps.  But lately, it comes so slow that by the time I’m finished with it, I’m so bloody sick of it that I can’t honestly tell you whether I like the poem or not, and for that reason, I don’t really feel like showing it to anyone.  This is not conducive to growth in my poetic pursuits. 

And frankly, I’m disgusted with the arts in general, especially visual art and poetry.  Both have become the stomping grounds of elitists, over-schooled intellectuals, and snobs.  If were to walk up to any given professor in the creative writing department here and tell them that my favorite poets were Robert Frost and Billy Collins (they aren’t, but that’s not the point), they would probably roll their eyes inwardly and stifle a snicker.  Or they might pass out from horror that I (a creative writing minor!) would like something so woefully common, so average, so quotidian!  So many trained writers automatically dismiss, at least in part, the writing that pleases the masses, without thinking that perhaps there is actually a reason that that particular writer does please the masses. 

Same thing with art.  Professional artists, as well as art critics, museum curators, and art professors, think there’s something wrong with you if you can’t talk about a piece in lofty terms.  What happened to, “Because it’s beautiful?”  Why does there always have to be a reason, a deep underlying current of meaning?  Sometimes the only reason for something is your appreciation for it, for a beautiful landscape, for a beautiful moment.  I’m not saying it’s not good to be able to talk about poetry and art in a sophisticated manner.  But it’s not good to poopoo those who can’t.  And some people can’t. 

Elitists, too, disdain everyday folks who write what they deem “greeting card verse” or sing-songy poetry.  Who in the hell gave them the right to tear these people apart?  A good deal of them aren’t ever going to publish or even seek to publish.  Not every person who makes a rhyme is going to turn into Yeats.  Not every person who writes poetry is the next Thomas Lux.  They know that!  I’m not saying it’s the kind of writing that I want to read, but if they want to write, more power to them.  You don’t have to read it if you don’t like it, and if you don’t like it, keep that fact to yourself.  Writing pleases them and gives them joy.  And it takes an enormous amount of courage to present anything you’ve made yourself, to share something that you feel has a little bit of your soul in it.  I can’t understand what educated poets are trying to achieve by making fun of blogs and websites where everyday folks post their poetry.  They can tell what kind of website they’re looking at in a few glances, and if it doesn’t match what they’re looking for, they should just move on.  Snide comments and jibes won’t get anyone anywhere. 

In other words, pooey on elitists!

On that note, here’s my poem:
The Snakeskin
 –

(This poem has been archived.)

12 Responses to “In the defense of “greeting card verse” and normal folks who like art”

  1. Jerry Says:

    If you don’t know who you should be writing for, write for me =D

    The thing I like about your writing is that I always know it’s from the heart. You have nothing to prove to anyone, considering what you’re capable of. Isn’t your poetry supposed to make YOU happy anyway? How many well-known poets were famous while they were still alive? And how many of them led lives of excess because of their sheer brilliance? I don’t buy the “imaginary reader” thing, at least when it comes to poetry. Everything you write should offer a glimpse of your soul, and with that in mind, poetry is completely worthless if you don’t add your own natural style to it. I say you write whatever truly pleases you and your audience will love it. I don’t know about you, but I’d rather read a poem from a sincere 5-year-old than to read some BS from one of those elitists you mentioned. Use what you’ve learned to shape your poetry if you’d like, but don’t stretch it out of proportion. Anyway, just remember that no matter what you do, you’ll always have at least one fan ;-)

  2. Mommy Says:

    I’d like to be your “ideal reader,” but I guess I’m disqualified as your mother! Thank you for this wonderful post, Ariel. As one of the common people who likes art, music, and literature, I have often wondered why the elitist snobs are often so vicious in their critiques of art or poetry that the “masses” like. Maybe they’re just peeved that THEIR fan base is so woefully tiny! Anyway, my advice for your writing is this: Remember what I used to say to you and Benjamin as you went out the door in the morning? “Be true to yourself, be true to God, be true to others.” I’m sure you must have gotten weary of hearing it, but really, I think, if you follow this wise motherly advice :) in your writing, you won’t go wrong. Remember also the other advice I gave you when you left for UNC, concerning your art and your writing: “When those elitist pointy-heads in Chapel Hill criticize your work, do this: Listen carefully, consider what they have to say thoughfully, apply what is useful, then move on.” You know who you are and what you stand for. Always be true to that.

  3. Mommy Says:

    Dang! *slaps self upside head* I completely forgot to mention how much I like your poem “The Snakeskin.” Gorgeous, vivid imagery–I love the phrase “an iridescent ghost of what had passed.” I remember our hike this summer to the top of the mountain where you found the snakeskin. You cradled it tenderly all the way back down, as though it were an ancient Egyptian papyrus scroll.

  4. A Big Fan Says:

    Thank you for your righteous rant,
    For these are awful times,
    When snooty eggheads say I can’t
    Write a poem that rhymes.

    I like the sound of words that roll
    Off the tongue so trippingly.
    They sometimes move and pierce my soul
    Before my lips can set them free.

    So thank you for your pithy words
    (You have a way with them, you know.
    Sometimes they rise to fly like birds;
    Sometimes, like mountain streams, they flow.)

    Keep writing; don’t be filled with doubt.
    Sing and ring your own big bell.
    Whisper, scream, holler, shout
    And always, always give them hell.

  5. Beth Says:

    Pooey on elitists, indeed! In fact, DOUBLE POOEY! I fart in their general direction!

  6. Ross Says:

    I doubt seriously that anyone in our Creative Writing department would scoff at Frost or Collins. You might get a hug from some of them if you said you love Frost. Collins gets a bad rap for his personal politics but many of his poems are downright terrific.

    Also, it’s curious that you separate Tom Lux out from Collins and Frost– I think he’s very accessible, and much funnier than most poets. (I refer you to any of his snake poems, which are always really tongue-in-cheek.)

    Don’t mistake the desire to be good with the desire to be highfalutin. Don’t mistake MFAs with elitism… that comes in many different forms. And don’t mistake criticism for dismissal. Respect the craft, do the work you know you’re capable of, and keep reading with an eye toward getting better, You mom is dead on– study widely, get lots of input, and then decide what makes you the poet you are.

    There are some terrific lines in “The Snakeskin.” You’re very close on that one.

    Fondly,
    one of those elitist pointy-heads in Chapel Hill
    :)

  7. random guy Says:

    I have to agree with your comments about the elitist, as beth says, I fart in their general direction as well. Nice poem. YAY!

  8. colleen Says:

    You should come out to our spoken word nights sometimes. It’s got that folksy flavor you would love. One of my close friends, poet and member of our writer’s circle has gone back to school for creative writing. She has stirred some of this up. It’s all good because it only helps me get clearer about who I am and am not.

  9. colleen Says:

    PS I was so happy when I discovered Billy Collins. He’s surprising, smart, whimsical, and accessible.

  10. ben (aka guitar maniac) Says:

    I remember – that was the same snakeskin that I accidently crushed …

    I agree with you — and love that poem, and Big Fan’s comedic commentary … and I think the awful thing going on right now is that people are extremely misinterpreting the use of philosophy. Its purpose is to look at art, literature, etc., and assess their finer points and consider whether they logically fit together and make sense, and eventually decide what is right. And the masses ARE mistaken in many senses — but those types of people take it too far, and reject all that is commonly liked. Sometimes there is a reason that it got that far.

  11. wesleyjeanne Says:

    Ariel,

    Nice rant. I know I told you about my experience as a poet at Chapel Hill. Of course I was a freshman and my poetry was immature (because, oh, I was immature, perhaps) and the person who shot me down and crushed my fledgling spirit was not faculty but a student of the CW department there. Nonetheless, I was told in no uncertain terms that I would never be a poet because my work was childish. It was long time before I wrote poetry again, and to be honest, I have only written maybe two poems since that day. Perhaps it was true and he saved me from the embarrassment of learning it from an instructor. Perhaps he was just an ass. I vote for the latter. Funny…I’ve never seen his name in print. Huh. Go figure.

    I think “Because it’s beautiful” or “Because it touched me” are perfectly good reasons for enjoying any kind of art. Why should there be another?

    You said it all well, as usual.

  12. car floor jacks Says:

    It’s the first time I comment here and I should say you give genuine, and quality information for bloggers! Great job.
    p.s. You have a very good template . Where did you find it?

Leave a Reply